Tuesday, March 20, 2007

The Role of the Pastor

A couple of years ago, I wrote an article about the role of pastors in the local churches. The audience I had in mind while writing it was other pastors. It seems to me that with the resurgence of militant Calvinism and the concurrent emphasis on multiple elders in each congregation that the role of the pastor-teacher, the undershepherd, God's man has been devalued. In Scripture and in experience, I see little evidence for demanding that each congregation have multiple elders, much less that each elder is equal in authority with each of the other elders. With that in mind, I quote my own article.

The pastor is described in the Scripture as a shepherd, elder, overseer, and
steward. These descriptions provide us with the parameters of his character,
responsibility, and authority.


Three criteria should govern the character of the man of God. First, he is an elder. That is, he should be seasoned in the service of the Lord, not new or immature in the ministry. He is to possess the proper seriousness of mind and demeanor that lends itself to the awesome task with which he is charged. It is a call to mature balance. Second, he is called to be blameless. That is, he is to be of sufficient character quality that no major character flaw can be laid to his account. He cannot be sinless for he is
a man still in the flesh and subject to the same temptations and shortcomings as
other believers. However, blamelessness indicates that the pastor is obedient,
humble, and yielded to God to the extent that he is an exemplary role model to
the believers under his charge. Third, he is a leader. That is, he is willing
and ready to step to the front and call others to follow him. He is to be
confident in his gifts and calling, but more confident in the One who called and
enables him.


The Lord lays heavy responsibility upon the shoulders of those
he calls to pastor his flocks. The pastor is described as a shepherd. That
indicates that he has the responsibility to feed, guide, and protect the flock.
He has a primary duty to feed the Word of God to the congregation. He must be
careful to declare the whole counsel of God, both the milk and the meat of the
Scriptures. He is also responsible to guide the church as a whole and believers
as individuals, so that they are equipped for life and ministry. Additionally,
he is charged with protecting the congregation from attacks, both from without
and within. This requires that he be vigilant and alert, and that he be courageous in dealing with wolves. The pastor is also described as an overseer. That indicates that he has the responsibility to provide direction for the entire enterprise of the church and to have charge for the spiritual welfare and development of its members. The pastor is also described as a steward, that is, the manager of the Master’s household.


The Bible sheds much light on the authority that goes along with the responsibilities of fulfilling the office of pastor. He is said to have "the rule", which is governing authority that congregants are admonished to "obey". The requisite authority to carry out his responsibilities is also implied in the titles "overseer" and "steward". The nature of his authority is hierarchal, moral, and spiritual. It is hierarchal in
that he is the chief officer in the chain of command of the local church, under
Christ. It is moral in that he is not to "lord over" those under his authority
by the barking of commands and presenting of demands. Rather, he is to lead and
to compel them by his example and love for them. It is spiritual in that his
exercise of authority should be with an eye to enhancing the church’s and the
individual’s relationship with God.


The role of the pastor requires a man of character who can shoulder responsibility and who can graciously exercise authority. He is the first among equals in the local body. His role demands that he have the skill to work with other leaders and officers and that he have the strength to provide them leadership. He is to be neither a despot nor a doormat. He is to be the willing patriarch of the household over which God places him as leader. In so leading, he will please his Master.

4 comments:

Howard Fisher said...

"It seems to me that with the resurgence of militant Calvinism and the concurrent emphasis on multiple elders in each congregation that the role of the pastor-teacher, the undershepherd, God's man has been devalued."

1) I am not sure what militant Calvinism is. In my experience, the only people that are being militant are the Southern Baptist ministers fighting Calvinism, and they are doing so with the most disrespectful, irreverent, vitriolic preaching I have ever heard.

2) I have actually been witness to the exact opposite. It has been the Single Pastor model and the board of deacons that has quite often weakened the pastor to where he is constantly worried whether the board will try to get rid of him.

I have yet to see this in a Calvinist church.

3) How does this logic follow? How does having a plurality of Elders lead to the diminishment of the "role of the pastor-teacher"? Again, I have personally witnessed the exact opposite.

I have a friend that in my mind would make a good pastor, but his RB pastor told him that he should not consider being a pastor at this time. They take the role of pastor extremely seriously. Perhaps the Southern Baptists that are reformed see Elders differently? Is this what you are seeing?

4) How does your argument deal with the texts Reformed Baptists (since not all Calvinists are Reformed nor for a plurality of Elders) would take the time to exegete?

5) Your description of a Pastor is excellent. I know of no RBs that would disagree with the substance of that which you describe.

Am I missing something here?

God Bless

Howard

Ed Groover said...

Howard,

What I mean by devalued is that the pastor is not seen as the authoritative doctrinal teacher and administrator of the church. And I didn't mean to imply that as being unique to Calvinists. (Although I can understand your reading it that way based on what I wrote.)

1. I've read militant Calvinists on the web. They are the ones that insist that their version of Calvinism is THE faith once delivered to the saints. They are also the ones that insist that no one but a five pointer of their stripe will ever preach in their pulpit. They are also the ones who insist that if one is not a five point Calvinist with their own understandings, one is at least an Arminian (if not a Pelagian or an Open Theist. Some don't see a distinction.).

2. I assure you that the solo pastor / deacon model is not the only model of church government that weakens the pastor and seeks to control the church. There are churches who have elders that are not really biblically qualified elders, but are rather laymen with an overweening desire to control the church AND its pastor. Imo, it is rare for the Lord to gift a small church with a multiplicity of real elders. In larger churches, He clearly does. And there is one who is the recognized leader, as I believe is consistent with the NT examples.

3. Having a multiplicity of elders does not have to lead to a diminishing of the pastor/teacher. But idea of complete parity among the elders usually augurs for it. Someone has to have the final word. The Scripture is replete with examples of that throughout. As long as there is a Moses or a Samuel or a James, Timothy, or Titus, having multiple God-called, God-gifted elders serving alongside makes sense. But having leadership by committee is an oxymoron.

4. I didn't try to deal with every possible argument within the scope of the article. I will at some point, but it will be in a different article.

5. Thanks. I have a friend in LA who is a Baptist and is Reformed in his theology. ( I don't know if he is 4 point or 5 point.) Interestingly, he has a church of 150 or so. They have one pastor/elder and two deacons, as I recall.

Howard Fisher said...

I just heard today that if you are an Episcopalian, then you view Timothy as the first Bishop of the church.

;-)

BTW: I have a book on church polity 5 views, if you are interested. The best arguments are between the Presbyterian and the Reformed Baptist.

Howard Fisher said...

"But idea of complete parity among the elders usually augurs for it."

Perhaps it does, but I don't see the NT warrant for rejecting parity among the Elders.

Keep in mind I agree that there usually is a leader. IParity doesn't necessarily mean there is no leadership among the leadership.

For instance, Peter seems to clearly be the oldest of the Apostles and is obviously seen as the groups leader. Yet Paul has no problem withstanding him to his face and pointing out his hypocrisy in front of the local church. The council at Jerusalem certainly had several leaders or Apostles voicing how they see the Gospel is to be applied to the massive Gentile conversions into the church.

So sometimes many voices (saying the same thing) among the leadership of the church is a good thing (since they were in agreement as to the nature of the Gospel and its application). Sometimes a leader may be brought back to his senses by those who are in equal authority with him.

God Bless

Howard